ChinaExamination GuideInventionsPatent LawProposed ChangesUpdates and Changes
17 November 2022

China Announcing More Proposed Amendments to the Examination Guidelines in 2022

It’s been a year and a half since the new Chinese Patent Law came into effect (1 June 2021). Although various versions of draft Examination Guidelines have been released, thus far no official finalized versions have been confirmed. On October 31, 2022, yet another new list of proposed amendments was published[1], this time consolidating the previous sets of proposed changes from 2020 to 2021 to the Examination Guidelines. As this version looks closer to a finalized version, we are cautiously optimistic that an official set of guidelines may soon be released. As such, we think it’s worth looking a bit more closely into this current draft version.

Below are a few of the new proposed changes that are worth our attention:

  • New rules for designs in view of China signing onto the Hague agreement
  • New rules and new examination standards for utility models
  • New rules for re-examination/invalidation proceedings
  • Eligibility requirements for patent term compensation, for regular patents (“PTA”) and drug patents (“PTE”)
  • Further requirements for genetic resources obtained in China
  • Detailed procedures regarding open licensing

Other important changes include:

  • New exception to the patentability of diagnostics
  • Sequence listings adopting ST.26 standards
  • Electronic receipt dates and associated deadlines (e.g., no more 15-day mailing period!)

Stay tuned for our upcoming articles for detailed discussions about these changes! If you have questions or concerns regarding any specific sections of the proposed Examination Guidelines or the new Chinese Patent Law, please feel free to reach out to us, and we will be happy to provide a personalized consultation.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

  1. Notice on Revised Guidelines for Patent Examination (Second Draft for Comments) (Published 31 Oct 2022), https://www.cnipa.gov.cn/art/2022/10/31/art_75_180016.html

About the Authors

Audrey Cheung is a Patent Technology Specialist at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

Jennifer Che, J.D. is Vice President, Principal, and a US Patent Attorney at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

Other Articles

Introducing the New USPTO Cancer Moonshot Expedited Examination Pilot Program

10 January 2023
Starting from February 1, 2023, the USPTO will begin the new Cancer Moonshot Expedited Examination Pilot Program that advances out-of-turn applications that are directed to oncology or smoking cessation. This new program will replace the Cancer Immunotherapy Pilot Program that has been in place since 2016, and covers more technologies than only cancer immunotherapies. Applications […]

Finally a unified “Court of Appeal” for technology IP in China

22 January 2019
On October 26, 2018, China’s Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) received approval to establish a specialized intellectual property court within the SPC to handle appeal cases involving technology-related IP for both civil (e.g., patent infringement) and administrative (e.g., patent invalidity) judgments. Technology-related IP includes invention patents, utility models, new plant species, IC design, trade secret, software, […]

Chinese Courts Cares More About Patent Quality Now (A Doctrine of Equivalents Story)

13 December 2022
There is no doubt that the drafting quality of a patent can be crucial in determining the success (or failure!) of the patent during litigation. However, due to various reasons, patents often fail to use the right drafting strategies that best protect the invention. Too often, inexperienced or unsophisticated patent drafters merely listen to an […]

Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

12 November 2018
Things may be brewing with respect to antibody inventions. Just how much description is sufficient? After losing in the Federal Circuit, Amgen has decided to ask the US Supreme Court to weigh in on a standard that could vastly influence the pharmaceutical and biotech industry. The story relates to Repatha™, an LDL-lowering drug from Amgen […]

Our Past Events

Top crossarrow-right