中国China Patent OfficeCNIPAEPOJPOKIPOPatent Prosecution HighwayPPHUSPTO
2024年4月23日

Stay Ahead: Getting a Chinese Patent in Three Months?

by
王怡瑾女士

The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has announced a significant development in the realm of patent prosecution: the initiation of the "PPH Improvement Initiative" in collaboration with key patent offices from the United States, Europe, Japan, and South Korea. This initiative aims to elevate the user experience of the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) by setting ambitious targets for the average cycle time of the first office action and the average cycle time for replying to applicants' responses, both now set at three months starting from 2024.

Here's a concise summary of the specific changes:

Timeline

Before

After

Average Cycle Time for First Notice1

Within Four Months

Within Three Months

Average Cycle Time for Replying to Applicants’ response

NA

Within Three Months

The PPH serves as an expedited patent examination pathway between different countries or regions, facilitating quicker patent examination processes through shared work among patent examination authorities. Since its inception in November 2011, CNIPA has established PPH cooperation with patent offices in 32 countries or regions.

In order to enhance the predictability of PPH application examination timelines, ongoing discussions among the IP52 have led to this initiative. Initially proposed by Japan and the United States, China's active participation underscores its commitment to this policy. Ideally, receiving a notice of grant within three months (or even shorter) is now within reach.

For enterprises aiming to penetrate global markets, this improvement policy promises to make examination timelines across different countries more predictable. It is anticipated that this will enable companies to manage their intellectual property systematically and strategically expand into the global market.

If you would like to have more information on this matter or would like to have our advice, please feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Eagle IP is a top-tier boutique patent firm with a unique mix of experienced US and Chinese patent professionals with significant cross-border knowledge and experience. Our technically expertise covers wide range of technologies including, but not limited, to life sciences, biotechnology, medicine, pharmaceuticals, material and environmental science, chemistry and consumer electronics. We have years of experiences in drafting and prosecuting patent applications involving biological deposits, sequence listings, small and large molecules, drug discovery and development, material science, software and engineering, and many others.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

  1. It could be Notice of Allowance or First Office Action. ↩︎
  2. IP5 is a forum of the five largest intellectual property offices in the world. The five patent offices are the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), and the National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA formerly SIPO) in China. ↩︎

其他文章

Foreigners Beware: China Proposes Requiring IP Made Using Exported Chinese Genetic Resources to be Co-Owned by Chinese Collaborators

2023年3月22日
Proposed Examination Guidelines for the New Chinese Patent Law – Topic 2: Genetic Resource Restriction How Will the Tightened Genetic Resource Restrictions Affect Your IP In 2019-2021, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology (“MOST”, or the Science Ministry) established several laws and regulations with respect to biosafety1 and human genetic resources management2 (collectively referred as […]

China Proposes New Examination Guidelines for Utility Models

2022年11月24日
The Utility Model (UM) in China has always been a popular choice for patent filing due to its relatively low cost and speed of prosecution. The UM prosecution only includes a preliminary examination, which is essentially a mini (stripped down) version of an invention application’s substantive examination.1 With the simplified examination process, UMs are typically […]

Obviousness: can features from different categories of products be combined to invalidate a design patent?

2025年9月18日
Introduction “I have a tank, I have a gun—boom! Tank gun?” Each year the CNIPA releases a list of Top Ten Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Cases. These cases are meant to be guiding cases, showcasing exemplary real-world decisions that clarify certain aspects of the law. Over the next several months we will be highlighting many […]

China Top 50 Case of 2019: How a Functional Feature is Construed Greatly Impacts Protection Scope - Shimano KK v. SENSAH

2020年7月20日
Every year in the spring The Supreme People’s Court of PRC announces its “Top 10 Intellectual Property (IP) cases” and “50 typical IP cases in Chinese courts” of the year. Although not having precedential weight, these cases serve as a reference and guide people's courts at all levels regarding their intellectual property trials. It’s always […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right