EIP Coffee BreakUpdates and Changes
2021年8月24日

China Finally Clamps Down on Facial Recognition Technology

Snippets of Court Cases, Provisions, and Key Observations about China’s IP Landscape

Around the end of July 2021, the Supreme People’s Court issued a new Provision concerning the application of law about a super-hot technology, facial recognition. This Provision is a legal explanation from the SPC explaining how the law should be applied or interpreted in a litigation.

This Provision emphasizes that facial information is sensitive biometric information. It is considered a type of personal information having the strongest social attributes, yet at the same time it is very easy to collect. It is fundamentally unique and unchangeable. Once leaked, it will cause extreme damage to individuals’ personal safety and property, and may even threaten public safety. Most importantly, the Provision emphasizes that protection of personal information is of great importance, and provides a lot more clarity on how various types of facial recognition technology would be considered with respect to their impact on an individual’s personal privacy rights.

We welcome such a change: China is finally becoming serious about personal information protection after so many years. This Provision will have a huge impact on the implementation of patents that use facial recognition technologies, and in turn will affect the value of such patents. As for whether it will affect such patent applications from the administrative order level, we will observe and see what happens now that the Provision has formally been implemented (1 Aug 2021).

Source: 最高法发布审理使用人脸识别技术处理个人信息相关民事案件的司法解释

About the Authors

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

其他文章

Obviousness: can features from different categories of products be combined to invalidate a design patent?

2025年9月18日
Introduction “I have a tank, I have a gun—boom! Tank gun?” Each year the CNIPA releases a list of Top Ten Patent Re-examination and Invalidation Cases. These cases are meant to be guiding cases, showcasing exemplary real-world decisions that clarify certain aspects of the law. Over the next several months we will be highlighting many […]

Patent Eligibility for Software in China

2022年4月4日
Technology has progressed significantly since the early days of patent law, when US lawmakers in 1952 could only envision patentable subject matter into categories like “process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter.” The recent explosion of new types of innovations that don’t fall neatly into these categories has resulted in a game of catch-up, where […]

China Divisional Practice

2019年6月17日
China allows the filing of divisional applications but under specific circumstances. Most importantly, divisional applications can usually only be filed voluntarily during the prosecution of the original parent application. Once the parent application is granted or withdrawn, no additional voluntary divisional applications may be filed. However, divisionals can be filed to pursue subject matter not […]
CN1982128B Figure

2019 CHINA TOP 10 IP CASE: VALEO V. LUCAS, FUKE, & CHEN

2020年6月8日
Every year in the spring The Supreme People’s Court of PRC announces its “Top 10 Intellectual Property (IP) cases” and “50 typical IP cases in Chinese courts” of the year. Although not having precedential weight, these cases serve as a reference and guide people's courts at all levels regarding their intellectual property trials. It’s always […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right