中国China Patent OfficeCNIPAEPOJPOKIPOPatent Prosecution HighwayPPHUSPTO
2024年4月23日

Stay Ahead: Getting a Chinese Patent in Three Months?

by
王怡瑾女士

The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has announced a significant development in the realm of patent prosecution: the initiation of the "PPH Improvement Initiative" in collaboration with key patent offices from the United States, Europe, Japan, and South Korea. This initiative aims to elevate the user experience of the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) by setting ambitious targets for the average cycle time of the first office action and the average cycle time for replying to applicants' responses, both now set at three months starting from 2024.

Here's a concise summary of the specific changes:

Timeline

Before

After

Average Cycle Time for First Notice1

Within Four Months

Within Three Months

Average Cycle Time for Replying to Applicants’ response

NA

Within Three Months

The PPH serves as an expedited patent examination pathway between different countries or regions, facilitating quicker patent examination processes through shared work among patent examination authorities. Since its inception in November 2011, CNIPA has established PPH cooperation with patent offices in 32 countries or regions.

In order to enhance the predictability of PPH application examination timelines, ongoing discussions among the IP52 have led to this initiative. Initially proposed by Japan and the United States, China's active participation underscores its commitment to this policy. Ideally, receiving a notice of grant within three months (or even shorter) is now within reach.

For enterprises aiming to penetrate global markets, this improvement policy promises to make examination timelines across different countries more predictable. It is anticipated that this will enable companies to manage their intellectual property systematically and strategically expand into the global market.

If you would like to have more information on this matter or would like to have our advice, please feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Eagle IP is a top-tier boutique patent firm with a unique mix of experienced US and Chinese patent professionals with significant cross-border knowledge and experience. Our technically expertise covers wide range of technologies including, but not limited, to life sciences, biotechnology, medicine, pharmaceuticals, material and environmental science, chemistry and consumer electronics. We have years of experiences in drafting and prosecuting patent applications involving biological deposits, sequence listings, small and large molecules, drug discovery and development, material science, software and engineering, and many others.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

  1. It could be Notice of Allowance or First Office Action. ↩︎
  2. IP5 is a forum of the five largest intellectual property offices in the world. The five patent offices are the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the European Patent Office (EPO), the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO), and the National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA formerly SIPO) in China. ↩︎

其他文章

Can I transfer priority rights in China without the consent of other applicants? Insights from the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent

2025年2月4日
The high-profile disputes surrounding an important CRISPR patent belonging to The Broad Institute, MIT and Harvard (hereinafter “the proprietors”) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years, particularly regarding the validity of priority rights that were challenged worldwide. In Europe, the patent was famously revoked by the European Patent Office (hereinafter “EPO”) due to […]

China’s Newest Examination Guidelines: Post-Filing Supplemental Data for Compounds (Part I)

2021年4月28日
Post-filing data in China has been a constant issue for many patent practitioners around the world. Examiners seem to require it often, and yet the rules regarding when it is acceptable have seemed much stricter than other jurisdictions worldwide. In fact, we tried to summarize the latest state of the law in an earlier blog […]

China Top 10 Patent Re-Examination and Invalidation Cases of 2020 CNIPA Upholds Bayer’s Rivaroxaban Patent

2021年6月9日
The development of China’s approach to patents, especially those in the pharmaceutical and biotech space, has been fascinating to watch. Those of us who have practiced in the area for a long time have been frustrated by the Chinese patent office’s overly strict rules regarding patentability (e.g., high data support standard and refusal to consider […]

Twice the Trouble: Unraveling a Single Case of Dual Patent and Trademark Infringement

2024年1月9日
Can a rights holder sue the same infringer separately based on one single infringing act that infringes both trademark and patent rights? An interesting case this year from China’s Supreme People’s Court that addresses this specific issue ((2023)最高法知民终235号). Beijing Run De Hong Tu Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Run De Hong Tu”) sued an individual named […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right