中國China Patent OfficeCNIPAEPOJPOKIPOPatent Prosecution HighwayPPHUSPTO
2024年4月23日

Stay Ahead: Getting a Chinese Patent in Three Months?

The China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has announced a significant development in the realm of patent prosecution: the initiation of the "PPH Improvement Initiative" in collaboration with key patent offices from the United States, Europe, Japan, and South Korea. This initiative aims to elevate the user experience of the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) by setting ambitious targets for the average cycle time of the first office action and the average cycle time for replying to applicants' responses, both now set at three months starting from 2024.

Here's a concise summary of the specific changes:

Timeline

Before

After

Average Cycle Time for First Notice1

Within Four Months

Within Three Months

Average Cycle Time for Replying to Applicants’ response

NA

Within Three Months

The PPH serves as an expedited patent examination pathway between different countries or regions, facilitating quicker patent examination processes through shared work among patent examination authorities. Since its inception in November 2011, CNIPA has established PPH cooperation with patent offices in 32 countries or regions.

In order to enhance the predictability of PPH application examination timelines, ongoing discussions among the IP52 have led to this initiative. Initially proposed by Japan and the United States, China's active participation underscores its commitment to this policy. Ideally, receiving a notice of grant within three months (or even shorter) is now within reach.

For enterprises aiming to penetrate global markets, this improvement policy promises to make examination timelines across different countries more predictable. It is anticipated that this will enable companies to manage their intellectual property systematically and strategically expand into the global market.

If you would like to have more information on this matter or would like to have our advice, please feel free to contact us at [email protected].

Eagle IP is a top-tier boutique patent firm with a unique mix of experienced US and Chinese patent professionals with significant cross-border knowledge and experience. Our technically expertise covers wide range of technologies including, but not limited, to life sciences, biotechnology, medicine, pharmaceuticals, material and environmental science, chemistry and consumer electronics. We have years of experiences in drafting and prosecuting patent applications involving biological deposits, sequence listings, small and large molecules, drug discovery and development, material science, software and engineering, and many others.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

About the Authors

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong and Shenzhen.

其他文章

First ever Invalidation decision on an RNAi Invention patent in China

2023年12月4日
Decision on Examination of Request for Invalidation (No. 58530) In one of China’s Top 10 Patent Re-examination / Invalidation cases of 2022, an invalidation decision on a patent claiming Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) RNAi compositions (No. 58530) by the Patent Re-examination Board (the “Board”) sheds light on the standard for post filing data for rejections […]
CN1982128B Figure

2019 CHINA TOP 10 IP CASE: VALEO V. LUCAS, FUKE, & CHEN

2020年6月8日
Every year in the spring The Supreme People’s Court of PRC announces its “Top 10 Intellectual Property (IP) cases” and “50 typical IP cases in Chinese courts” of the year. Although not having precedential weight, these cases serve as a reference and guide people's courts at all levels regarding their intellectual property trials. It’s always […]

Compositions Limited by Use: A Cautionary Tale

2022年10月26日
Section 4.2.3, Part II Chapter 10 of the CNIPA’s Examination Guidelines (“Guidelines”) stipulates that if the specification only discloses one property or use of a composition, the composition claim shall be drafted as a “composition limited by the function or the use”. Furthermore, it specifically states that “most pharmaceutical claims shall be drafted as claims […]

How a Secondhand Ground Brush Wiped Away a Chinese Patent

2024年12月4日
A Chinese robot vacuum company digs up “hidden evidence” to successfully invalidate a patent owned by its biggest competitor.  Highlights Background  With the growth of online shopping, it is easier than ever to provide evidence of a sale when the product is still being sold on the market. But what if the product is no […]

我們過去活動

Top crossarrow-right