中國Patent LinkagePatent Term ExtensionUpdates and Changes
2021年8月4日

CHINA: New Patent Examination Guidelines Now Available for Public Comment

Two months after the new Chinese Patent law came into effect, the CNIPA has released a new set of Patent Examination Guidelines (proposed version) for public comments on Aug 3, 2021.

Here are the explanation of the amendments (Chinese only). Here is the full set of proposed amendments (Chinese only).

Briefly, the new amendment focuses on the following points:

  1. Updated Design Application System, involving requirements for partial designs and GUI applications, obviousness standard for designs, domestic priority, and other procedural requirements;
  2. Newly added provisions about the Patent Cooperation Treaty, including incorporation, priority restoration, addition, correction, etc.;
  3. Newly added provisions about Patent Term Extension and Patent Term Adjustment’;
  4. Newly added provisions about Open Licensing and the procedures thereof;
  5. Newly added provisions about Patent Linkage;
  6. Newly added provisions about Grace Period for novelty under emergencies;
  7. Provide special requirements to improve the quality and efficiency of Examination, such as how to examine obviousness for utility model applications, and how to examine computer program patent applications. Provide more ways to initiating Ex-officio review in re-examination and invalidation cases.
  8. Simplified Procedures for several types of requests; and
  9. Change of Patent Office Structure.

We will study these in detail and will focus more closely on points 1-5 in subsequent articles.

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

其他文章

Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

2018年11月12日
Things may be brewing with respect to antibody inventions. Just how much description is sufficient? After losing in the Federal Circuit, Amgen has decided to ask the US Supreme Court to weigh in on a standard that could vastly influence the pharmaceutical and biotech industry. The story relates to Repatha™, an LDL-lowering drug from Amgen […]

RNAi Patent Success in China: Overcoming “Comprising” Claim Challenges

2025年3月10日
An Update on Sufficiency and Inventiveness of RNAi Patents in China RNAi is a fast-developing technology that has gained traction in the pharmaceutical industry as a promising therapeutic agent. It is important to follow closely RNAi patent proceedings to learn how different examination boards and courts understand and handle these new technologies. The first-ever invalidation […]

China Top 10 Cases of 2020 – CNIPA Upholds Second Medical Use Patent from University of Bordeaux

2021年5月24日
The development of China’s approach to patents, especially those in the pharmaceutical and biotech space, has been fascinating to watch. Those of us who have practiced in the area for a long time have been frustrated by the Chinese patent office’s overly strict rules regarding patentability (e.g., high data support standard and refusal to consider […]

IP Strategies for the Newly Released Implementation Regulations of the 4th Amendment of the Chinese Patent Law: Part 1: Delayed Examination

2024年1月25日
December 2023 appears to have been an exceptionally busy and fruitful month in the China patent space. Following the State Council’s approval of the long-awaited Patent Law Implementation Regulations (“Regulations”, similar to the CFR in the US) in November, the CNIPA finally made public the full text of the Regulations just before the arrival of […]

我們過去活動

Top crossarrow-right