中國Patent LinkagePatent Term ExtensionUpdates and Changes
2021年8月4日

CHINA: New Patent Examination Guidelines Now Available for Public Comment

Two months after the new Chinese Patent law came into effect, the CNIPA has released a new set of Patent Examination Guidelines (proposed version) for public comments on Aug 3, 2021.

Here are the explanation of the amendments (Chinese only). Here is the full set of proposed amendments (Chinese only).

Briefly, the new amendment focuses on the following points:

  1. Updated Design Application System, involving requirements for partial designs and GUI applications, obviousness standard for designs, domestic priority, and other procedural requirements;
  2. Newly added provisions about the Patent Cooperation Treaty, including incorporation, priority restoration, addition, correction, etc.;
  3. Newly added provisions about Patent Term Extension and Patent Term Adjustment’;
  4. Newly added provisions about Open Licensing and the procedures thereof;
  5. Newly added provisions about Patent Linkage;
  6. Newly added provisions about Grace Period for novelty under emergencies;
  7. Provide special requirements to improve the quality and efficiency of Examination, such as how to examine obviousness for utility model applications, and how to examine computer program patent applications. Provide more ways to initiating Ex-officio review in re-examination and invalidation cases.
  8. Simplified Procedures for several types of requests; and
  9. Change of Patent Office Structure.

We will study these in detail and will focus more closely on points 1-5 in subsequent articles.

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

其他文章

The Latest on Post-Filing Data in China’s Patent Law

2020年4月29日
Post-filing data can sometimes be the crucial difference between a patent allowance and a final rejection. The reasons are endless why important data may not have been included in the original patent application as filed. Time and budget may have been insufficient to generate data over the full scope of the claims at the time […]

FOLLOW UP: Amendments to the China Patent Examination Guidelines in 2022 – Part 1: New rules for designs in view of China signing onto the Hague Agreement

2023年1月4日
Since the publication of our earlier article about China signing onto the Hague Agreement, some of our Hong Kong clients have expressed interest in taking advantage of the Hague international design application system, i.e., filing a Hague international design application with the CNIPA (Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration) as a receiving office (RO). Up until […]

Major and Exciting Changes to China’s Patent Law [Fourth Amendment to China's Patent Law]

2019年2月20日
Major changes are on the horizon for China’s Patent Law, which will see an overhaul in many areas as early as this year (2019). On January 4, 2019, the National People’s Congress in China published the latest draft of the Fourth Amendment to China’s Patent Law. Several draft amendments have been released for public comment […]

Foreigners Beware: China Proposes Requiring IP Made Using Exported Chinese Genetic Resources to be Co-Owned by Chinese Collaborators

2023年3月22日
Proposed Examination Guidelines for the New Chinese Patent Law – Topic 2: Genetic Resource Restriction How Will the Tightened Genetic Resource Restrictions Affect Your IP In 2019-2021, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology (“MOST”, or the Science Ministry) established several laws and regulations with respect to biosafety1 and human genetic resources management2 (collectively referred as […]

我們過去活動

Top crossarrow-right