中国TreatyWIPO
2022年2月11日

China Joins Two WIPO Treaties, the Hague System and the Marrakesh Treaty

Snow Pine painted by artist Evelyn Hui, mother of Eagle IP’s founder Dr. Jacqueline Lui

It has been two challenging years, yet there are many reasons to still have hope. We wish you a blessed Lunar New Year as we welcome the year of the Tiger.

We wanted to highlight a few new developments in China.

China has joined the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, submitting its instrument of accession to the 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement on February 5, 2022. The Act will go into effect in China on May 5, 2022.

The Hague System provides a way for designers to file a single international design application to register up to 100 designs in up to 94 countries. This helps applicants save time and money on filing separately applications in each jurisdiction. Applicants don’t need to file a national or regional design application first. They can just directly file an international application in the Hague System in one language with one set of fees.

China joining the Hague System gives international designers the option to obtain design patent rights in China through the streamlined Hague System. Chinese designers likewise will have access to the Hague System and access to streamlined design registration in 90+ countries.

As part of this process, China has been updating its design patent laws to comply with Hague System requirements, most notably increasing design patent protection life from 10 years to 15 years in the newest 4th Amendment of the Patent Law. Full details will be available in May. Please note that Hong Kong and Macau are not included.

On the same day, China also signed onto the Marrakesh Treaty, a humanitarian treaty aimed at removing copyright barriers to providing visual impaired people access to published works. The Marrakesh Treaty was adopted on June 27, 2013 and is also administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). It currently has 84 contracting parties, including China, the US, and the European Union.

Eagle IP are experts in patent law and we offer a one-stop service for your global IP needs.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

About the Authors

Jennifer Che, J.D. is Vice President and Principal at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

其他文章

Connecting the Dots: China’s Evolving Standard for Numerical Sub-Range Amendments

2026年7月22日
Managing global pharmaceutical or chemical portfolios requires navigating China’s notoriously rigid standards on the "same subject matter" requirement for priority and claim amendments. A recent invalidation decision (No. 588094) issued by the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) concerning a pharmaceutical patent provides clarity on how numerical ranges and later added experimental data are evaluated […]

How the Chinese Patent Office Rejected a Plate-Making Method Based on Food Safety Law

2022年10月19日
Previously we published an article about CNIPA rejecting a patent application claiming a food that could also be used to treat or prevent diseases based on the food’s alleged non-compliance with Food Safety Law. China’s Food Safety Law includes a provision which states any use of a composition as a food must be strictly separated […]

When Standards Evolve: How China Judges Inventiveness in Next-Gen Tech Patents

2025年9月30日
Starting in 2023, Datang Mobile, one of the key players in China’s telecom standardization efforts, initiated infringement proceedings against Samsung in China, Germany, and the US. Samsung responded by filing multiple invalidation petitions in several jurisdictions, including China, the United States, and Europe. The case discussed below is one of above-mentioned invalidation cases in China, […]

Patent Inventiveness in China: Why “Common Knowledge” Must Be Proven, Not Assumed

2026年8月14日
A Case Study of the "Electronic Blackboard" Case, (2025) SPC Zhi Xing Zhong No. 286 I. Introduction In assessing inventive step for invention patents, determining whether a technical solution would have been “readily conceivable” to a person skilled in the art has long been one of the most disputed and uncertain aspects of the analysis. […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right