We are delighted to announce that Eagle IP has been recognized once more by IAM Patent 1000 - The World's Leading Patent Professionals - as a top ranked, “Highly Recommended Firm in Patent Prosecution”.

The IAM Patent 1000 is a respected annual directory dedicated to identifying leading patent firms and individual practitioners globally. Published by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM), the guide covers key jurisdictions and evaluates capabilities across the core areas of patent law. Inclusion in the directory is determined by a rigorous, independent research process that includes 900+ extensive interviews with in-house counsel, patent attorneys, and industry experts.

According to IAM, Eagle IP has carved out “a distinctive reputation for far-reaching and highly sophisticated patent protection” and “a prime pick for life sciences companies, research institutions and technology-driven enterprises navigating complex international patent strategies.”

IAM has further highlighted five individuals from our firm: Our President and Managing Director, Ms. Jennifer Che, Principal Ms. Yolanda Wang, Principal Ms. Pauli Wong, Dr. Jacqueline C Lui, Dr. Ho Chung Lui.

We are incredibly honoured to be included in this highest category among a select group of Hong Kong’s top IP firms. We are deeply grateful to IAM for this recognition of our work. At Eagle IP, we are dedicated to providing exceptional service to our clients by drawing upon our hands-on knowledge of US, Chinese, and Hong Kong patent laws, our proven ability to craft sophisticated and creative patent strategies, and our strong technical expertise. We will continue to build upon these strengths to deliver the highest level of service and support to the innovators who entrust us with protecting their groundbreaking ideas.

As always, a huge THANK YOU to all our clients, mentors, and colleagues who have supported us through the years.

我们的过去活动

Recommended Insights

Patent Inventiveness in China: Why “Common Knowledge” Must Be Proven, Not Assumed

2026年8月14日
A Case Study of the "Electronic Blackboard" Case, (2025) SPC Zhi Xing Zhong No. 286 I. Introduction In assessing inventive step for invention patents, determining whether a technical solution would have been “readily conceivable” to a person skilled in the art has long been one of the most disputed and uncertain aspects of the analysis. […]

IP Update: China’s Supreme People’s Court Issues First Public Decision Defining China’s Inventorship Standard

2026年6月1日
In theory China's inventorship standard is similar to others around the world. An inventor is anyone who "makes creative contributions to the substantive features" of an invention. But what does this mean, and how does one apply this standard? Up to this point, this issue hasn't really been litigated much in China (at least according […]
CN1982128B Figure

2019 CHINA TOP 10 IP CASE: VALEO V. LUCAS, FUKE, & CHEN

2020年6月8日
Every year in the spring The Supreme People’s Court of PRC announces its “Top 10 Intellectual Property (IP) cases” and “50 typical IP cases in Chinese courts” of the year. Although not having precedential weight, these cases serve as a reference and guide people's courts at all levels regarding their intellectual property trials. It’s always […]

Foreigners Beware: China Proposes Requiring IP Made Using Exported Chinese Genetic Resources to be Co-Owned by Chinese Collaborators

2023年3月22日
Proposed Examination Guidelines for the New Chinese Patent Law – Topic 2: Genetic Resource Restriction How Will the Tightened Genetic Resource Restrictions Affect Your IP In 2019-2021, China’s Ministry of Science and Technology (“MOST”, or the Science Ministry) established several laws and regulations with respect to biosafety1 and human genetic resources management2 (collectively referred as […]
Top crossarrow-right