Biotech中国Court CasesCourtsPatent LawPharma
2022年6月16日

What Kind of Damage Awards Can You Get in China?

Is it worth filing for a patent in China? What kind of damage awards can you get?

Pharma companies care more about injunction than damage awards, since it’s quite unlikely that any damage award can compensate for the large amounts of money that may be lost for patent infringement. Chinese courts often issue injunctions in pharma patent litigations (both by the court and administrative enforcement bureaus), though damage awards are possible too.

Although not all court cases are publicly available, there have been some recent published cases with pretty high damage awards, ranging from $750K USD to $25M USD. Keep in mind these are cases litigated under the old patent law, where punitive damages did not exist. Going forward, as punitive damages of up to five times are now part of the new patent law, future damage awards are likely to be even higher.

Uncooperative Defendants? Patentees Can Provide Evidence of Profits

In 2021, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) awarded a $20 Million RMB ($3 Million USD) damage amount to a Swiss medical device company Synthes GmbH for patent infringement by a Chinese medical device company. The patent related to a medical device for treating femoral fractures which consisted of “a main nail” and “a bone fixation element.”

This particular case is interesting because the Court calculated the damage amount by relying on the patentee’s reasonable assessment of the profits, using evidence such as the infringer’s prospectus reporting the company’s annual operating profits. The court determined that the defendant did not adequately disclose its true profits (e.g., they claimed most of the receipts were “lost” or “missing”). Accordingly, the final assessed profits were based on information provided by the patentee, resulting in this very large $3 Million USD damage award.

Largest Damage Award 2021

The largest damage award of 2021 that we found based on publicly available records was $167 Million RMB ($25M USD), for infringement of a patent originally filed by Toshiba (sold to Oaks Engineering) for an air conditioning compressor. In October 2021, the Intermediate Court ruled that the defendant’s prior art defense was not valid, and proceeded to award a $167M RMB damage award to the plaintiff (Oaks) for patent infringement. The defendant may appeal, so this case is still not over yet.

Pharmaceutical Cases

A recent life science case from 2021 involving a patent covering a fermentation process for synthesizing dibasic acids had a $5 Million RMB award. In general, most successful pharmaceutical cases result in permanent injunctions.

Willful Damages

Willful damages were just added to the patent law in June 2021, and thus the number of judgments will inevitably be lower than in a typical full year. We have not yet found any published cases, though official Chinese Court communications indicate that in 2021 courts across China handled 642,968 IP cases, and awarded punitive damages in 895 cases (0.13% of cases).

About the Authors

Jennifer Che, J.D. is Vice President and Principal at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

其他文章

China Announcing More Proposed Amendments to the Examination Guidelines in 2022

2022年11月17日
It’s been a year and a half since the new Chinese Patent Law came into effect (1 June 2021). Although various versions of draft Examination Guidelines have been released, thus far no official finalized versions have been confirmed. On October 31, 2022, yet another new list of proposed amendments was published1, this time consolidating the […]

Is it Sufficient to Claim an Antibody only by Describing its Antigen?

2018年11月12日
Things may be brewing with respect to antibody inventions. Just how much description is sufficient? After losing in the Federal Circuit, Amgen has decided to ask the US Supreme Court to weigh in on a standard that could vastly influence the pharmaceutical and biotech industry. The story relates to Repatha™, an LDL-lowering drug from Amgen […]

When Standards Evolve: How China Judges Inventiveness in Next-Gen Tech Patents

2025年9月30日
Starting in 2023, Datang Mobile, one of the key players in China’s telecom standardization efforts, initiated infringement proceedings against Samsung in China, Germany, and the US. Samsung responded by filing multiple invalidation petitions in several jurisdictions, including China, the United States, and Europe. The case discussed below is one of above-mentioned invalidation cases in China, […]

Twice the Trouble: Unraveling a Single Case of Dual Patent and Trademark Infringement

2024年1月9日
Can a rights holder sue the same infringer separately based on one single infringing act that infringes both trademark and patent rights? An interesting case this year from China’s Supreme People’s Court that addresses this specific issue ((2023)最高法知民终235号). Beijing Run De Hong Tu Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Run De Hong Tu”) sued an individual named […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right