Biotech中国Court CasesCourtsPatent LawPharma
2022年6月16日

What Kind of Damage Awards Can You Get in China?

Is it worth filing for a patent in China? What kind of damage awards can you get?

Pharma companies care more about injunction than damage awards, since it’s quite unlikely that any damage award can compensate for the large amounts of money that may be lost for patent infringement. Chinese courts often issue injunctions in pharma patent litigations (both by the court and administrative enforcement bureaus), though damage awards are possible too.

Although not all court cases are publicly available, there have been some recent published cases with pretty high damage awards, ranging from $750K USD to $25M USD. Keep in mind these are cases litigated under the old patent law, where punitive damages did not exist. Going forward, as punitive damages of up to five times are now part of the new patent law, future damage awards are likely to be even higher.

Uncooperative Defendants? Patentees Can Provide Evidence of Profits

In 2021, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) awarded a $20 Million RMB ($3 Million USD) damage amount to a Swiss medical device company Synthes GmbH for patent infringement by a Chinese medical device company. The patent related to a medical device for treating femoral fractures which consisted of “a main nail” and “a bone fixation element.”

This particular case is interesting because the Court calculated the damage amount by relying on the patentee’s reasonable assessment of the profits, using evidence such as the infringer’s prospectus reporting the company’s annual operating profits. The court determined that the defendant did not adequately disclose its true profits (e.g., they claimed most of the receipts were “lost” or “missing”). Accordingly, the final assessed profits were based on information provided by the patentee, resulting in this very large $3 Million USD damage award.

Largest Damage Award 2021

The largest damage award of 2021 that we found based on publicly available records was $167 Million RMB ($25M USD), for infringement of a patent originally filed by Toshiba (sold to Oaks Engineering) for an air conditioning compressor. In October 2021, the Intermediate Court ruled that the defendant’s prior art defense was not valid, and proceeded to award a $167M RMB damage award to the plaintiff (Oaks) for patent infringement. The defendant may appeal, so this case is still not over yet.

Pharmaceutical Cases

A recent life science case from 2021 involving a patent covering a fermentation process for synthesizing dibasic acids had a $5 Million RMB award. In general, most successful pharmaceutical cases result in permanent injunctions.

Willful Damages

Willful damages were just added to the patent law in June 2021, and thus the number of judgments will inevitably be lower than in a typical full year. We have not yet found any published cases, though official Chinese Court communications indicate that in 2021 courts across China handled 642,968 IP cases, and awarded punitive damages in 895 cases (0.13% of cases).

About the Authors

Jennifer Che, J.D. is Vice President and Principal at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

Yolanda Wang is a Principal, Chinese Patent Attorney, and Chinese Patent Litigator at Eagle IP, a Boutique Patent Firm with offices in Hong Kong, Shenzhen, and Macau.

This article is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice or a legal opinion on a specific set of facts.

其他文章

Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data

2026年1月23日
On December 31, 2025, The Supreme People's Court upheld the Beijing IP Court's decision, meaning that the semaglutide patent remains valid and will expire on March 20, 2026. Novo Nordisk announced this positive news via a press release on the day the case was decided. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has also confirmed this decision […]

Can Post Filing Data Overcome Inventive Step in China?

2018年11月19日
Since 2010, the Patent Re-examination Board (PRB) has published the top 10 patent invalidation cases of the year in April of each year. The selection criteria are high social concern, significant impact on the related industry, or involve difficult legal issues and important examination criteria. Below is one of the top 10 cases that discusses […]
Tapentadol.svg

Polymorph Patents in China: What is the Standard for Inventiveness for New Crystal Forms?

2020年7月14日
This case is focused on polymorphs, namely what are the standards for novelty and inventiveness when it comes to new crystal forms of a known drug? A recent Supreme People’s Court decision in China is illustrative of the way Chinese courts are thinking about polymorph patents in China. Grünenthal is a German pharmaceutical company and […]

Thin Disclosure but "Bulletproof" Protection: How a Salt Form Patent was Upheld in China Despite Minimal Data

2026年1月8日
In China, innovative drug companies typically rely on their initial composition of matter patents to block out competitors. Other “follow-on” IP, such as those directed towards formulations, polymorphs, and salt forms, are often regarded as less likely to survive invalidation challenges, especially in China where the standard of “person skilled in the art” is so […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right