中国China Patent OfficeCNIPACourt CasesPharma
2026年1月23日

Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data

On December 31, 2025, The Supreme People's Court upheld the Beijing IP Court's decision, meaning that the semaglutide patent remains valid and will expire on March 20, 2026. Novo Nordisk announced this positive news via a press release on the day the case was decided. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has also confirmed this decision on their website.

This case is certainly positive news for those in the biopharmaceutical industry thinking of developing their drugs in China. Additionally, if you've been following this case, you'll know that the validity of the patent came down to whether the Court would accept post-filing data demonstrating semaglutide's surprising pharmacokinetic effects in animal models. After all, there was no experimental data in the original application as filed (which is why the CNIPA originally rejected the case).

This high-profile case further demonstrates China's willingness to consider post-filing data, provided that the data are submitted under China's stricter post-filing data requirements. In this case, the specification provided sufficient "proof" that the ideas of the surprising technical effects were already established in the original application as filed, even if the data were not present.

其他文章

Can I transfer priority rights in China without the consent of other applicants? Insights from the Broad Institute’s CRISPR patent

2025年2月4日
The high-profile disputes surrounding an important CRISPR patent belonging to The Broad Institute, MIT and Harvard (hereinafter “the proprietors”) has attracted a lot of attention in recent years, particularly regarding the validity of priority rights that were challenged worldwide. In Europe, the patent was famously revoked by the European Patent Office (hereinafter “EPO”) due to […]

Inventive Step for an Enantiomer over a Racemate: “L-ornidazole” Patent Invalidation Case

2023年11月27日
Each year, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issues its annual “Judgment Digests”, which includes a list of “48 typical cases” highlighting representative SPC decisions in the previous year. The Judgment Digests help us understand more about the SPC’s judicial ideology, trial concepts, and adjudication methods in dealing with difficult and sophisticated legal issues as well […]

How Far Can an Employer Reach to Own Employee-made “Service Inventions”?

2020年7月30日
2019 China’s Top 50 Representative IP Cases Shenzhen Weibang Technology Co. Ltd v. Li Jianyi & Shenzhen Yuancheng Intelligence Equipment Co. Ltd (2019最高法民申6342号) Each year in China there are hundreds of disputes over patent ownership.  A significant part of them are related to “Service Inventions”, which are defined in Article 6 of the Chinese Patent […]

Compositions Limited by Use: A Cautionary Tale

2022年10月26日
Section 4.2.3, Part II Chapter 10 of the CNIPA’s Examination Guidelines (“Guidelines”) stipulates that if the specification only discloses one property or use of a composition, the composition claim shall be drafted as a “composition limited by the function or the use”. Furthermore, it specifically states that “most pharmaceutical claims shall be drafted as claims […]

我们的过去活动

Top crossarrow-right