中國China Patent OfficeCNIPACourt CasesPharma
2026年1月23日

Beijing Supreme People’s Court Upholds Novo Nordisk Semaglutide Patent in China based on Post-Filing Data

On December 31, 2025, The Supreme People's Court upheld the Beijing IP Court's decision, meaning that the semaglutide patent remains valid and will expire on March 20, 2026. Novo Nordisk announced this positive news via a press release on the day the case was decided. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has also confirmed this decision on their website.

This case is certainly positive news for those in the biopharmaceutical industry thinking of developing their drugs in China. Additionally, if you've been following this case, you'll know that the validity of the patent came down to whether the Court would accept post-filing data demonstrating semaglutide's surprising pharmacokinetic effects in animal models. After all, there was no experimental data in the original application as filed (which is why the CNIPA originally rejected the case).

This high-profile case further demonstrates China's willingness to consider post-filing data, provided that the data are submitted under China's stricter post-filing data requirements. In this case, the specification provided sufficient "proof" that the ideas of the surprising technical effects were already established in the original application as filed, even if the data were not present.

其他文章

China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) Hands Down First Patent Linkage Appeal Decision

2022年9月21日
China has been implementing a plethora of new laws and measures that are particularly favorable to drug companies, such as patent term extension and patent linkage.  Details of the new implementation measures for patent linkage (technically “early dispute resolution mechanisms for drug patents”) came into effect on July 4, 2021. At around the same time, […]

China Proposes New Examination Guidelines for Utility Models

2022年11月24日
The Utility Model (UM) in China has always been a popular choice for patent filing due to its relatively low cost and speed of prosecution. The UM prosecution only includes a preliminary examination, which is essentially a mini (stripped down) version of an invention application’s substantive examination.1 With the simplified examination process, UMs are typically […]

FOLLOW UP: Amendments to the China Patent Examination Guidelines in 2022 – Part 1: New rules for designs in view of China signing onto the Hague Agreement

2023年1月4日
Since the publication of our earlier article about China signing onto the Hague Agreement, some of our Hong Kong clients have expressed interest in taking advantage of the Hague international design application system, i.e., filing a Hague international design application with the CNIPA (Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration) as a receiving office (RO). Up until […]

Is “Comparable” the New “Unexpected”? China’s SPC Relaxes Inventive Step Standard for Breakthrough Therapeutics

2026年7月14日
How the Supreme People's Court Established a New Benchmark for Unexpected Technical Effects in a Landmark Diabetic Nephropathy Case Proving inventive step for pharmaceutical compounds, especially a second medical use, remains one of the most challenging aspects of patent prosecution in China. When the prior art discloses a compound's general therapeutic properties, how can an […]

我們過去活動

Top crossarrow-right